Real Spins From German Casino
Discover the random number generators RNG used in virtual roulette online casino tables with computer generated graphics, learn how random they are and whether they can be beaten. Can Online Roulette Be Beaten? We are all about beating the game at roulette physics, so the questions on our mind’s (and perhaps our reader’s minds) is whether online roulette can be beaten? We must start this discussion at the beginning; in online roulette, as in live roulette, the odds are in the casino’s favor. So, if over the course of a lifetime of playing roulette, a European nobleman or woman bets one hundred million dollars on a combination of inside and outside wagers, he or she can expect to lose between $1,350,000 and $2,700,000. An American can expect to lose between $2,630,000 and $5,260,000 on those same wagers. The math is merciless.
Legitimate techniques beat roulette, but RNG roulette is not roulette. It may look like it with those fancy animations, but essentially it is a slot machine. The only people ever to have won consistently at slot machines are people that use cheating devices such as the light wand. Dec 01, 2014 “0” (for European Roulette) or “0 and 00” (for American Roulette). It is also called the house edge. So, to say that the outcome of the RNG can’t be beaten it's not correct. The idea is that the “RNG + house edge” can't be beaten. Now let’s discuss here how we are going to bet the RNG. At the end of e-book you will see. Feb 22, 2017 Slot machines installed with non-complex RNGs can be beaten by high-tech devices and prediction algorithms. Attacking a Slot Machine's RNG Willy Allison. How random.org can be manipulated. Roulette the long term, this makes the casino more money than they pay out. This rng also the reason why European roulette is a better option than its American counterpart. Russian Hackers Find a Way To Beat RNG Slots - Roulette Physics. This effectively doubles roulette house edge to 5.
The best source of real roulette spins is http://www.spielbank-wiesbaden.de/index.php?id=82&view=archiv. However, the page is in German, although you can use Google translate. Otherwise it’s not difficult to guess what each word means.
2,000,000 Real RNG Spins
RNG stands for Random Number Generator. The numbers are determined by specialized computer hardware shown right, not a real roulette wheel. Your home PC cannot generate true RNG spins without such hardware. The zip file download contains 1 million spins each for single and double zero roulette. But keep in mind RNG roulette is not really roulette at all – its just a slot machine with roulette animations.
Videos of Real Spins
For any roulette systems that consider real roulette wheel physics, see the high quality videos of real roulette spins at http://www.roulettetraining.com/videos/
Automated Interblock American (00)
This is 1603 spins from a real automated roulette wheel in the USA. Unfortunately the player who sent these didn’t specify the direction.
Automated Alfastreet (single 0)
This is a video I created for a player who wanted to use my roulette computer for an automated wheel, so originally it was supposed to be private. It isn’t a lot of spins, but enough for testing technology like roulette computers.
Thread Rating:
letswin
That is not true randomness.
The software Dr Haahr uses to produce random numbers or sequences follows a number of rules set in place. The only difference is, Haahr's software has a much more complicated programming using Atmospheric noise captured by radios.
It even explains on Random.org that it's pseudo randomness because of the current problem with computing (bits using 0's and 1's) rather then quantum computing which uses 0's and 1's and everything between (infinite).
The software Dr Haahr uses to produce random numbers or sequences follows a number of rules set in place. The only difference is, Haahr's software has a much more complicated programming using Atmospheric noise captured by radios.
It even explains on Random.org that it's pseudo randomness because of the current problem with computing (bits using 0's and 1's) rather then quantum computing which uses 0's and 1's and everything between (infinite).
'RANDOM.ORG offers true random numbers to anyone on the Internet. The randomness comes from atmospheric noise, which for many purposes is better than the pseudo-random number algorithms typically used in computer programs.'
Verbatim from the site.
letswin
That is not true randomness.
The software Dr Haahr uses to produce random numbers or sequences follows a number of rules set in place. The only difference is, Haahr's software has a much more complicated programming using Atmospheric noise captured by radios.
It even explains on Random.org that it's pseudo randomness because of the current problem with computing (bits using 0's and 1's) rather then quantum computing which uses 0's and 1's and everything between (infinite).
Hopefully, your method is much more random then random.org.. right?
Or do you just go on random.org and generate a random number and if it's even, you bet on banker, odd is player?
The software Dr Haahr uses to produce random numbers or sequences follows a number of rules set in place. The only difference is, Haahr's software has a much more complicated programming using Atmospheric noise captured by radios.
It even explains on Random.org that it's pseudo randomness because of the current problem with computing (bits using 0's and 1's) rather then quantum computing which uses 0's and 1's and everything between (infinite).
Hopefully, your method is much more random then random.org.. right?
Or do you just go on random.org and generate a random number and if it's even, you bet on banker, odd is player?
To answer your question, I use a plethora of random generators. Combined with a certain method. Which is an ever changing variable.
JoeSnow
To answer your question, I use a plethora of random generators. Combined with a certain method. Which is an ever changing variable.
So what you mean to say is, even you don't believe Random.org is truly random, since if it was truly random, you won't have to add more layers to chance variables.
Quote: letswin
'RANDOM.ORG offers true random numbers to anyone on the Internet. The randomness comes from atmospheric noise, which for many purposes is better than the pseudo-random number algorithms typically used in computer programs.'
Verbatim from the site.
Verbatim from the site.
Go to the analysis section on random.org and on there you can read that random.org is just a better version of currently existing RNG generators and can't actually prove that it is truly random.
Again, if anyone can create a method of true randomness and can prove it, they would be winning every science award created the next day. Dr. Haahr obviously can't prove it, since if he can, his face would be plastered everywhere in every science journal in the world.
letswin
So what you mean to say is, even you don't believe Random.org is truly random, since if it was truly random, you won't have to add more layers to chance variables.
I do believe random.org is truly random, but, you have to add more layers, in order to keep your bets from being apart of a previously established pattern.
EvenBob
To answer your question, I use a plethora of random generators. Combined with a certain method. Which is an ever changing variable.
LOL! No you don't. You're so knowledgeable
about this, you thought I was giving you a
compliment when I said you were winning
right at the house edge. LOL again..
'It's not enough to succeed, your friends must fail.' Gore Vidal
JoeSnow
I do believe random.org is truly random, but, you have to add more layers, in order to keep your bets from being apart of a previously established pattern.
Can Rng Roulette Be Beaten By Police
If you add layers to a truly random number generator, then it actually loses its' integrity, and in itself becomes 'less' random. How can your bets be an established pattern of non-randomness, if you are using a 'true' random number generator?letswin
So what you mean to say is, even you don't believe Random.org is truly random, since if it was truly random, you won't have to add more layers to chance variables.
Go to the analysis section on random.org and on there you can read that random.org is just a better version of currently existing RNG generators and can't actually prove that it is truly random.
Again, if anyone can create a method of true randomness and can prove it, they would be winning every science award created the next day. Dr. Haahr obviously can't prove it, since if he can, his face would be plastered everywhere in every science journal in the world.
Go to the analysis section on random.org and on there you can read that random.org is just a better version of currently existing RNG generators and can't actually prove that it is truly random.
Again, if anyone can create a method of true randomness and can prove it, they would be winning every science award created the next day. Dr. Haahr obviously can't prove it, since if he can, his face would be plastered everywhere in every science journal in the world.
I won't argue this with you. It is pointless to argue what a person or persons feels or believes, certain individuals will or will not do, based on what they can or cannot accomplish. It is nonsense to suggest there is an absolute to what actions a person will or will not take based on various variables. It really is. However, I will say, the randomness offered here at random.org, is definitely, more close to true randomness than baccarat will ever be. Which is why true randomness, if used properly, can beat it.
AxelWolf
Can Rng Roulette Be Beaten Away
Ok. Please, read what I post before responding. Dublinbet offers free play there, where you can bet with free money against their live shoes. It's a really unique way to test your system/systems against live dealt cards. They have a camera showing the cards being dealt, so you at least know your testing is done against real shoes. I would suggest someone to go there to TEST their methods out against live shoes with the FREE money account only. No way would I EVER myself, or suggest for ANYONE to use real money at any online casino.
Second, I have generated $500k in my free money account. At any time, anyone can have the account information and log in and see this for themselves.
Third, I already stated more than once why I'm here. To share my experiences (winning) and to give people who do gamble playing baccarat (and probably lose) information and advice about creating systems and the best theory to apply when creating one.
Taking a day or a few hours out of my time to do this service here? For free? In no way means that any of my claims are bogus, or that I have some sort of alternative motive. I have stated countless times that I am not interested in partners, investments, to sell my system, to recruit anyone. I get it though. To close minded, negative people, it's really hard to believe anyone would do what I'm doing. And perhaps, one day (when you're successful), people such as yourself will reflect on how and why someone such as myself would do what I am doing. I have lost $100,000s of dollars playing baccarat and finally created something that works. Won all my money back plus a fortune more. I would be SELFISH if I wouldn't do what I'm doing.
However, I will never reveal my PERSONAL working method. But, the theory I have given away, is SOUND and will allow ANYONE who puts work into to create a system that works for them and either changes their life for good? Or allows them to at least win back all or at least most, of the money they've lost to casinos!
Possibly? Even stop them from LOSING any money...as I suggest ENDLESS Amounts of testing before EVER betting a real $1.
.
Second, I have generated $500k in my free money account. At any time, anyone can have the account information and log in and see this for themselves.
Third, I already stated more than once why I'm here. To share my experiences (winning) and to give people who do gamble playing baccarat (and probably lose) information and advice about creating systems and the best theory to apply when creating one.
Taking a day or a few hours out of my time to do this service here? For free? In no way means that any of my claims are bogus, or that I have some sort of alternative motive. I have stated countless times that I am not interested in partners, investments, to sell my system, to recruit anyone. I get it though. To close minded, negative people, it's really hard to believe anyone would do what I'm doing. And perhaps, one day (when you're successful), people such as yourself will reflect on how and why someone such as myself would do what I am doing. I have lost $100,000s of dollars playing baccarat and finally created something that works. Won all my money back plus a fortune more. I would be SELFISH if I wouldn't do what I'm doing.
However, I will never reveal my PERSONAL working method. But, the theory I have given away, is SOUND and will allow ANYONE who puts work into to create a system that works for them and either changes their life for good? Or allows them to at least win back all or at least most, of the money they've lost to casinos!
Possibly? Even stop them from LOSING any money...as I suggest ENDLESS Amounts of testing before EVER betting a real $1.
.
In that case I must ask the mods if I can change my name to letswinWithAxelWolf, I generated over 26 million in My Ellis Island free money account using my system and it only took minutes. I didn't start out as a big loser. I never once got behind. EI chips might actually be worth something(doubtful very much ). It only took me $5000 chippies(although they gave more to start out with, I didn't need it). Anyone can get an account log in and see this for themselves.
So look no further everybody. I WILL reveal my PERSONAL working method to the right people. Unless you want to lose 500k and spend ENDLESS hours first learning and developing a inferior method of you'r own( from someone who himself lost a fortune and was asking for help just a short time ago)
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
letswin
If you add layers to a truly random number generator, then it actually loses its' integrity, and in itself becomes 'less' random. How can your bets be an established pattern of non-randomness, if you are using a 'true' random number generator?
Just straight random, will only increase your odds slightly. Or, better put, make your bets truly 50/50. Which is still a negative expectancy since banker in baccarat wins slightly more than player and gets charged a commission.
You have to do better than that.
JoeSnow
I won't argue this with you. It is pointless to argue what a person or persons feels or believes, certain individuals will or will not do, based on what they can or cannot accomplish. It is nonsense to suggest there is an absolute to what actions a person will or will not take based on various variables. It really is. However, I will say, the randomness offered here at random.org, is definitely, more close to true randomness than baccarat will ever be. Which is why true randomness, if used properly, can beat it.
I'm not trying to argue, and I would LOVE for a certain individual like yourself to devise a strategy to win at Bac and share it with everyone on this forum like you claim you are doing.
What I'm doing is debunking what you say one by one, so if your system truly works, we can both shoo away the naysayers who claim your method isn't logical.
So essentially, I'm helping you. Do you disagree with this logic?
Quote: letswin
Just straight random, will only increase your odds slightly. Or, better put, make your bets truly 50/50. Which is still a negative expectancy since banker in baccarat wins slightly more than player and gets charged a commission.
You have to do better than that.
You have to do better than that.
Seems you edited your post.
So you are admitting that random.org isn't truly random. But, you adding in different layers will make something MORE random which will give you an even closer randomness to 'true randomness' you can possibly achieve. Which in turn, will increase your odds.
Do you see where your logic fails or do you want me to explain it to you?